Efficacy of Alexander Technique Versus Progressive Relaxation Technique in Improving the Functional Activity of Security Guards with Mechanical Low Back Pain- A Randomized Experimental Trial

Life Sciences-Nursing

Authors

  • Srinivasan M Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry, India.
  • Murugaraj T Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry, India.
  • Venkatesh K Research scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth; Pondicherry, India.
  • Sabarish Hariharan N Research scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth; Pondicherry, India.
  • Shanmugananth E Professor and Head, Department of Physiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.2.SP2.L16-L20

Keywords:

Mechanical Low Back Pain, Alexander Technique, Progressive Relaxation Technique, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index.

Abstract

Low Back Pain is quite common in them. Changes in posture or poor body mechanics may cause the above spine-related problems, causing other muscles to be misused and become painful. However, mechanical Low Back Pain usually does not cause weakness or numbness in the lower extremities because the problem is not due to compression of the spinal nerves. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Alexander and progressive relaxation techniques in inducing relaxation and improving the functional activity of individuals with mechanical low back pain. It is a simple experimental study. For the study, 40 subjects were divided randomly into groups, namely group A and group B, each consisting of 20 subjects. Group A was given the Alexander technique, and Group B was given the progressive relaxation technique. The Visual Analogue Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index were used.: The collected data were recorded and tabulated. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 20 version – USA ) to present the study's findings. Comparison of pre-and post-visual analog scale (VAS) using the Alexander technique shows pre-VAS 6.75 and post-VAS reduced to 2.55, given t-value 20.03, thus providing significant results with p< 0.001 s.s. Comparison of pre and post-VAS using progressive relaxation technique shows pre-VAS at 6.9 and post-VAS reduced to 3.6. Given a t-value of 14.91 gives a significant result with a p< 0.001. This study concluded that the Alexander technique is more effective in mechanical low back pain subjects. This study will help select interventions in mechanical low back pain subjects. 

References

“Low Back Pain: Why Movement Is so Important for Back Pain - InformedHealth.org - NCBI Bookshelf.” Low Back Pain: Why Movement Is so Important for Back Pain - InformedHealth.org - NCBI Bookshelf, 14 Feb. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK284944.

Muly, Mansi Manoj, et al. “Association of Mechanical Low Back Pain and Quality of Life in Security Guards.” International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, vol. 11, no. 4, Galore Knowledge Publication Pvt. Ltd., Apr. 2021, pp. 153–56. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20210420.

Toussaint, Loren, et al. “Effectiveness of Progressive Muscle Relaxation, Deep Breathing, and Guided Imagery in Promoting Psychological and Physiological States of Relaxation.” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, edited by Ruth Taylor-Piliae, vol. 2021, Hindawi Limited, July 2021, pp. 1–8. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5924040.

“Low Back Pain: Relaxation Techniques for Back Pain - InformedHealth.org - NCBI Bookshelf.” Low Back Pain: Relaxation Techniques for Back Pain - InformedHealth.org - NCBI Bookshelf, 14 Feb. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK284952.

Vambheim, Sara Magelssen, et al. “Relaxation Techniques as an Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 8, Elsevier BV, Aug. 2021, p. e07837. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07837.

Mateu M, Alda O, Inda MD, Margarit C, Ajo R, Morales D, van-der Hofstadt CJ, Peiró AM. Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study of Self-administered Jacobson Relaxation in Chronic, Nonspecific, Low-back Pain. Altern Ther Health Med. 2018 Nov;24(6):22-30. PMID: 30982021.

Woodman, J. P., and N. R. Moore. “Evidence for the Effectiveness of Alexander Technique Lessons in Medical and Health-related Conditions: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 66, no. 1, Hindawi Limited, Dec. 2011, pp. 98–112. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02817.x.

Little, P., et al. “Randomised Controlled Trial of Alexander Technique Lessons, Exercise, and Massage (ATEAM) for Chronic and Recurrent Back Pain.” BMJ, vol. 337, no. aug19 2, BMJ, Aug. 2008, pp. a884–a884. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a884.

Zakra. “A Short History of AT – Alexander Technique Science.” A Short History of AT – Alexander Technique Science, 30 Jan. 2021, www.alexandertechniquescience.com/a-short-history-of-at.

Boonstra, Anne M., et al. “Reliability and Validity of the Visual Analogue Scale for Disability in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.” International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 31, no. 2, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), June 2008, pp. 165–69. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0b013e3282fc0f93.

Couper, Mick P., et al. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales.” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 24, no. 2, SAGE Publications, May 2006, pp. 227–45. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305281503.

Fairbank, Jeremy C. T., and Paul B. Pynsent. “The Oswestry Disability Index.” Spine, vol. 25, no. 22, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Nov. 2000, pp. 2940–53. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.

Grotle, Margreth, et al. “Concurrent Comparison of Responsiveness in Pain and Functional Status Measurements Used for Patients With Low Back Pain.” Spine, vol. 29, no. 21, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Nov. 2004, pp. E492–501. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000143664.02702.0b.

Davidson, Megan, and Jennifer L. Keating. “A Comparison of Five Low Back Disability Questionnaires: Reliability and Responsiveness.” Physical Therapy, vol. 82, no. 1, Oxford UP (OUP), Jan. 2002, pp. 8–24. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.1.8.

Brumagne, Simon, et al. “Persons With Recurrent Low Back Pain Exhibit a Rigid Postural Control Strategy.” European Spine Journal, vol. 17, no. 9, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, July 2008, pp. 1177–84. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0709-7.

Dr. K. Jaiganesh, Dr. S. Parthasarathy, and Mr. Duraisamy , Effect of Suryanamaskar Practices with and Without Yoga Nidra On Stress Among High School Students- A Randomized Controlled Trial.(2022).Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res.12(6), L28-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2022.12.6.SP25.L28-33.

Murugaraj.T, Ashila, Sabarish Hariharan, Mossadeq.A, and Shanmugananth.E , Effectiveness of Kegel Exercise Combined With Utkatasana on Symptoms Associated With Stress Urinary Incontinence On Middle Aged Women.(2022).Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res.12(6), L66-72 http://dx.doi.org/10.22376/ijpbs/lpr.2022.12.6.SP25.L66-72

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

M, S., T, M. ., K, V., Hariharan N, S. ., & E, S. (2023). Efficacy of Alexander Technique Versus Progressive Relaxation Technique in Improving the Functional Activity of Security Guards with Mechanical Low Back Pain- A Randomized Experimental Trial: Life Sciences-Nursing. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 13(Special issue 4), L16-L20. https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.2.SP2.L16-L20

Issue

Section

Research Articles